Social Choice Situations and Aggregation Criteria: Inductive Reasoning in Social Choice Theory
نویسندگان
چکیده
The usual procedure in Social Choice Theory consists in postulating some desirable properties which a aggregation procedure should verify and from them to derive the features of the corresponding social choice function and the outcomes that arise at each possible profile of preferences. In this paper we invert this line of reasoning and try to infer, up from what we call social situations (each one consisting of a profile and the associated social ordering) the criteria verified in the implicit aggregation procedure. Furthermore we derive them in axiomatic form. This inference process, which extracts intentional from extensional information can be seen as an exercise in social choice-theoretic “statistics”. The fact that complete intentional characterizations of the aggregation process cannot be derived in such way can be easily seen as a consequence of the procedure.
منابع مشابه
Logics of Interaction , Coalitions and Social Choice ( extended abstract )
While different forms of social interaction have been extensively studied in several fields, the development of formal logics makes precise knowledge representation and mechanical reasoning about situations involving social interaction possible. In particular, such logics make it possible to formally specify and verify software implementing social mechanisms. In my talk I will give an overview ...
متن کاملTowards a theory of MCDM: stepping away from social choice theory
The similarity between aggregation procedures in social choice theory and multicriteria decision aiding is well-known : the alternatives play the role of the candidates, the criteria play the role of the voters and the decision-maker plays the role of the society. Many authors, aware of this similarity, have used the formalism of social choice theory in multi-criteria decision aiding; see for e...
متن کاملTheory Choice and Social Choice : Kuhn versus Arrow
Kuhn’s famous thesis that there is ‘no unique algorithm’ for choosing between rival scientific theories is analysed using the machinery of social choice theory. It is shown that the problem of theory choice as posed by Kuhn is formally identical to a standard social choice problem. This suggests that analogues of well-known results from the social choice literature, such as Arrow’s impossibilit...
متن کاملA Computational Account of Social Reasoning
People are amateur social psychologists: they explain other people’s behavior, infer what other people are thinking and feeling, and predict how other people will act. I will refer to this sort of psychologizing as social reasoning in order to highlight the fact that it involves reasoning about people. Social reasoning often requires significant leaps of inductive inference: people infer others...
متن کاملDecision Making under Uncertainty: Social Choice and Manipulation
My research seeks insight into the complexity of computational reasoning under uncertain information. I focus on preference aggregation and social choice. Insights in these areas have broader impacts in the areas of complexity theory, autonomous agents, and uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Motivation: Planning and reasoning in nondeterministic settings is something that people take for g...
متن کامل